IWX vs. SCHV
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IWX tracks the Russell Top 200 Value Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 11.67%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for SCHV. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
IWX vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWX having a 11.67% annualized return and SCHV not far behind at 11.51%.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
IWX vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 14.74% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.97% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and SCHV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IWX and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWX vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
SCHV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
SCHV
Technology
IWX
SCHV
Healthcare
IWX
SCHV
Industrials
IWX
SCHV
Communication Services
IWX
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
IWX
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
SCHV
Energy
IWX
SCHV
Utilities
IWX
SCHV
Basic Materials
IWX
SCHV
Real Estate
IWX
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
SCHV
IWX vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.50 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 4.38 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.89 | 17.71 | +2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05 | 2.82 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.73 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.68 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.72 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IWX vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -37.08% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -6.83% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -15.26% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -19.78% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -37.08% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -3.83% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.68% | -0.15% |
Volatility
IWX vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 2.76%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 2.97% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 8.14% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.04% | 10.63% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 14.51% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 16.93% | -0.42% |
IWX vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWX vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than SCHV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.47% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IWX and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to IWX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, IWX leads with 11.67% vs 11.51% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWX has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWX.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.47% for IWX.
IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.04% for SCHV.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer