IWX vs. PWV
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IWX tracks the Russell Top 200 Value Index while PWV tracks the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 11.66%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for PWV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PWV.
Performance
IWX vs. PWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 18.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWX having a 11.66% annualized return and PWV not far ahead at 11.97%.
IWX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- YTD
- 17.71%
- 1Y
- 28.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
PWV
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
IWX vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 17.71% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 18.98% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 29.84% | -14.12% | 16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and PWV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IWX and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.93 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
PWV
IWX vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWX | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.52 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 7.03 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.63 | 24.40 | -5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWX vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and PWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -49.04% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -4.05% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -14.31% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -16.36% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -37.67% | +1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.33% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -9.45% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 1.17% | +0.37% |
Volatility
IWX vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 3.47%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 3.83% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 7.23% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 9.72% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 14.33% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 17.13% | -0.65% |
IWX vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWX vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than PWV's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.69% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWX and PWV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to IWX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs PWV's -49.04%.
On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 11.97% vs 11.66% for IWX. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.43% for IWX.
IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.58% for PWV.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and PWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer