IWV vs. VWRD.L
IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.84%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for VWRD.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRD.L.
Performance
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than VWRD.L's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has outperformed VWRD.L with an annualized return of 14.84%, while VWRD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.94% annualized return.
IWV
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
VWRD.L
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 9.30% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 10.27% | 22.39% | 17.65% | 22.31% | -18.19% | 18.52% | 16.13% | 25.67% | -9.70% | 24.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and VWRD.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | 0.59 |
The correlation between IWV and VWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWV
VWRD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
IWV
VWRD.L
Financial Services
IWV
VWRD.L
Communication Services
IWV
VWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IWV
VWRD.L
Industrials
IWV
VWRD.L
Healthcare
IWV
VWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
IWV
VWRD.L
Energy
IWV
VWRD.L
Real Estate
IWV
VWRD.L
Utilities
IWV
VWRD.L
Basic Materials
IWV
VWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
VWRD.L
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWV | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.91 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 11.88 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and VWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -33.83% | -21.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -8.80% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -16.25% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -26.02% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -33.83% | -1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -1.99% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -4.51% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.16% | -0.18% |
Volatility
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 4.40% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 10.29% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 12.77% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 15.38% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 15.73% | +2.70% |
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWV vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than VWRD.L's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.25% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWV and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.
IWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.22% for VWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for IWV and VWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer