VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L).
VWRD.L and IWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VWRD.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World Index. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. IWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both VWRD.L and IWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VWRD.L or IWDA.L.
Correlation
The correlation between VWRD.L and IWDA.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VWRD.L:
1.50
IWDA.L:
1.53
VWRD.L:
2.07
IWDA.L:
2.11
VWRD.L:
1.27
IWDA.L:
1.28
VWRD.L:
2.24
IWDA.L:
2.37
VWRD.L:
8.76
IWDA.L:
9.01
VWRD.L:
1.96%
IWDA.L:
1.99%
VWRD.L:
11.53%
IWDA.L:
11.79%
VWRD.L:
-33.83%
IWDA.L:
-34.11%
VWRD.L:
-0.57%
IWDA.L:
-0.74%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VWRD.L having a 4.27% return and IWDA.L slightly lower at 4.10%. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 9.23%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.
VWRD.L
4.27%
1.49%
6.33%
17.63%
10.67%
9.23%
IWDA.L
4.10%
1.05%
6.80%
18.44%
11.77%
10.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VWRD.L
IWDA.L
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.07% | 2.25% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and IWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VWRD.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.