IWV vs. VNQ
IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.84%/yr vs 5.65%/yr for VNQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.
Performance
IWV vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 14.84%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.
IWV
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
IWV vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 9.30% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and VNQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IWV and VNQ has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IWV vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWV
VNQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IWV
VNQ
Financial Services
IWV
VNQ
Communication Services
IWV
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
IWV
VNQ
-
Industrials
IWV
VNQ
Healthcare
IWV
VNQ
-
Consumer Defensive
IWV
VNQ
-
Energy
IWV
VNQ
Real Estate
IWV
VNQ
Utilities
IWV
VNQ
-
Basic Materials
IWV
VNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
VNQ
IWV vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWV | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 1.56 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 4.90 | +7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWV vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -73.07% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -8.34% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -17.46% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -34.48% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -42.40% | +7.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | 0.00% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -13.61% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.65% | -0.67% |
Volatility
IWV vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is 4.44%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that IWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 4.72% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 9.77% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 13.54% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 18.84% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 20.72% | -2.29% |
IWV vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWV vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than VNQ's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWV and VNQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to IWV (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 10-year performance, IWV leads with 14.84% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IWV has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWV has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.87% for IWV.
IWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VNQ is REIT. IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.13% for VNQ.
IWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWV and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer