IWV vs. SLV
IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.85%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IWV vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 14.85%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
IWV
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
IWV vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 11.36% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and SLV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.21 |
IWV vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWV
SLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IWV
SLV
-
Financial Services
IWV
SLV
-
Communication Services
IWV
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWV
SLV
-
Industrials
IWV
SLV
-
Healthcare
IWV
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
IWV
SLV
-
Energy
IWV
SLV
-
Real Estate
IWV
SLV
-
Utilities
IWV
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IWV
SLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
SLV
IWV vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.69 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 5.76 | +8.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.94 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.49 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
IWV vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -76.28% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -42.45% | +33.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -42.45% | +23.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -42.45% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -42.81% | +7.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -36.57% | +36.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -44.67% | +34.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 19.81% | -17.88% |
Volatility
IWV vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is 2.91%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that IWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 16.34% | -13.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 58.31% | -49.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 58.90% | -46.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 36.15% | -18.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 31.83% | -13.43% |
IWV vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWV vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWV and SLV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to IWV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.63% vs 14.85% for IWV. On fees, IWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.63% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IWV has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SLV is Silver. IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.50% for SLV.
IWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWV and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer