IWV vs. ESN
IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IWV tracks the Russell 3000 Index while ESN tracks the Essential 40 Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWV returned 21.48% vs 27.64% for ESN. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ESN.
Performance
IWV vs. ESN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than ESN's 16.65% return.
IWV
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 21.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.56%
ESN
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.17M | $1.60M | $1.63M | |
| $79.44M | $75.17M | $98.92M |
IWV vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 10.30% | 16.96% | 0.54% |
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 16.65% | 16.52% | -3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and ESN is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IWV and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
ESN
IWV vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWV | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 4.12 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 16.52 | -6.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWV vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than ESN's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and ESN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -13.60% | -42.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -6.42% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.53% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -1.81% | -8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.60% | +0.45% |
Volatility
IWV vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.65%. This indicates that IWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 2.65% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 7.51% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.99% | 9.98% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 13.04% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 13.04% | +5.36% |
IWV vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWV vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than ESN's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 0.78% | 0.91% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.88% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWV and ESN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWV has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to ESN (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs ESN's -13.60%.
On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 27.64% vs 21.48% for IWV. On fees, IWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 21.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.
IWV has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.78% for ESN.
IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while ESN tracks Essential 40 Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KKM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.70% for ESN.
ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWV and ESN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer