PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESN vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESN vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESN achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.76% return.


ESN

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
14.03%
6M
13.86%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.09%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESN vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
14.03%16.52%-3.53%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
9.76%17.85%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ESN and IVV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024

0.79

The correlation between ESN and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESN vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESN
ESN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESN vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESNIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

3.03

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.22

13.61

+2.61

ESN vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESN Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESN and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESN vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESN drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESN and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESNIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-55.25%

+41.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-8.89%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.74%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-10.76%

+8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.98%

-0.35%

Volatility

ESN vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) is 3.29%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that ESN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESNIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.67%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

9.75%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

12.41%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

16.97%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.29%

18.10%

-4.81%

ESN vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESN vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

ESN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
0.80%0.91%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESN and IVV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to ESN (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESN dropped -13.60% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 1-year performance, IVV leads with 26.83% vs 26.37% for ESN. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVV has performed better with a 26.83% return vs 26.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.80% for ESN.

ESN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. ESN tracks Essential 40 Stock Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: KKM Financial and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ESN and 0.03% for IVV.

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESN and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer