IWR vs. UMBMX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX).
IWR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. UMBMX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2006.
Performance
IWR vs. UMBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWR vs. UMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.98% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund | 4.28% | 15.46% | 22.93% | 12.73% | -17.31% | 15.69% | 27.28% | 20.76% | -9.83% | 24.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than UMBMX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IWR has underperformed UMBMX with an annualized return of 10.77%, while UMBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.
IWR
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
UMBMX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWR vs. UMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBMX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. UMBMX — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
UMBMX
IWR vs. UMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWR | UMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.29 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.84 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.94 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 8.46 | -2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWR | UMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.29 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and UMBMX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWR vs. UMBMX - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than UMBMX's 9.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.27% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund | 9.87% | 10.29% | 15.75% | 0.17% | 4.21% | 11.54% | 2.40% | 0.74% | 8.09% | 8.38% | 2.39% | 8.74% |
Drawdowns
IWR vs. UMBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than UMBMX's maximum drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and UMBMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | UMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -49.91% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -12.62% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -26.30% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -36.91% | -3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -6.43% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -7.15% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.90% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IWR vs. UMBMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 5.48%, while Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | UMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 6.54% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 11.13% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.08% | 18.58% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 17.71% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 19.06% | +0.29% |