PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBMX vs. BUFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMBMX achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than BUFSX's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, UMBMX has outperformed BUFSX with an annualized return of 13.03%, while BUFSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.


UMBMX

1D
1.16%
1M
2.43%
YTD
14.57%
6M
12.89%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
13.03%

BUFSX

1D
2.61%
1M
4.78%
YTD
16.55%
6M
13.28%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
-3.10%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
14.57%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
16.55%-0.13%5.38%5.45%-30.01%4.44%66.49%40.97%-5.73%26.96%

Correlation

The correlation between UMBMX and BUFSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.86

The correlation between UMBMX and BUFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBMX vs. BUFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFSX
BUFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BUFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UMBMXBUFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.57

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.69

5.77

+5.92

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the BUFSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMBMX and BUFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBMX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, smaller than the maximum BUFSX drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBMX and BUFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBMXBUFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.91%

-53.24%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-14.92%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-26.39%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-46.57%

+20.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

-46.74%

+9.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-20.61%

+20.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-12.93%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

4.06%

-1.72%

Volatility

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) is 5.35%, while Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that UMBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBMXBUFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

6.94%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

14.59%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

19.68%

-4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

24.60%

-6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

24.63%

-5.48%

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBMX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFSX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMBMX vs. BUFSX - Dividend Comparison

UMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, while BUFSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.53%9.01%9.14%31.02%30.30%25.19%70.18%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
8.98%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMBMX and BUFSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFSX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to UMBMX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMBMX dropped -49.91% vs BUFSX's -53.24%.

UMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBMX and BUFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer