IWR vs. QQJG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) and QQJG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - IWR tracks the Russell Midcap Index while QQJG tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IWR returned 17.25%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for QQJG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQJG.

Performance

IWR vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than QQJG's 1.44% return.

IWR

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.79%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWR vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF	12.43%	10.37%	15.21%	17.05%	-17.48%	1.69%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	17.20%	-27.69%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and QQJG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between IWR and QQJG has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWR vs. QQJG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWR	QQJG
Industrials	18.4%	6.4%
Technology	17.2%	44.5%
Financial Services	12.5%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	14.3%
Healthcare	8.7%	18.2%
Energy	7.2%	1.6%
Real Estate	7.0%	-
Utilities	6.1%	-
Basic Materials	4.3%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	3.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	6.2%

Return for Risk

IWR vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR

IWR Risk / Return Rank: 49
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 58

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 45
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWR vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWR	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.37	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.97	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.42	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	8.87	+1.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWR vs. QQJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the QQJG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and QQJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWR	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.37	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.17	+0.33

Drawdowns

IWR vs. QQJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than QQJG's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and QQJG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWR	QQJG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.78%	-36.76%	-22.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-7.93%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.09%	-23.48%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-2.09%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-15.32%	+7.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	2.15%	-0.04%

Volatility

IWR vs. QQJG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) at 0.00%. This indicates that IWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWR	QQJG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	0.00%	+3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	8.32%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	14.05%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	21.70%	-3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	21.70%	-2.34%

IWR vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QQJG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWR vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than QQJG's 13.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF	1.15%	1.29%	1.27%	1.43%	1.59%	1.04%	1.28%	1.43%	1.98%	1.52%	1.72%	1.59%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWR and QQJG in my portfolio?

IWR and QQJG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWR or QQJG?

IWR has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to QQJG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs QQJG's -36.76%.

Which ETF is better, IWR or QQJG?

On 3-year performance, IWR leads with 17.25% vs 14.09% for QQJG. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QQJG has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWR or QQJG?

Over the 3-year period, IWR has performed better with a 17.25% return vs 14.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWR or QQJG?

IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQJG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWR or QQJG?

QQJG has the higher dividend yield at 13.86%, compared with 1.15% for IWR.

What is the main difference between IWR and QQJG?

IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index, while QQJG tracks Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWR and 0.20% for QQJG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.