IWR vs. IBIT
IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWR is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWR returned 20.25% vs -44.50% for IBIT. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IWR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IWR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.22% return.
IWR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.95%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -24.95%
- YTD
- -28.22%
- 1Y
- -44.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.30B | $1.34B | $1.68B | |
| $186.41M | $266.84M | $222.00M |
IWR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 14.55% | 10.37% | 16.43% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.22% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and IBIT is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
IBIT
IWR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.83 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | -0.87 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | -1.34 | +10.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -53.30% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -53.30% | +45.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -50.01% | +49.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -18.24% | +10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 34.66% | -32.56% |
Volatility
IWR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 2.48%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 9.21% | -6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 33.74% | -23.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 44.46% | -30.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 49.60% | -31.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 49.60% | -30.29% |
IWR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWR and IBIT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to IWR (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs IBIT's -53.30%.
On 1-year performance, IWR leads with 20.25% vs -44.50% for IBIT. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWR has performed better with a 20.25% return vs -44.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IWR is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWR and 0.25% for IBIT.
IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWR and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer