IWR vs. IBIC
IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWR returned 23.42% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. IWR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
IWR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.
IWR
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 23.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 13.93% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 8.25% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and IBIC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.00 |
The correlation between IWR and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
IBIC
IWR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 2.21 | -0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 16.41 | -13.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 58.11 | -47.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -0.90% | -57.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -0.27% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.11% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -0.10% | -7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 0.08% | +2.05% |
Volatility
IWR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that IWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 0.16% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | 0.67% | +9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 0.89% | +12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 1.57% | +16.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 1.57% | +17.83% |
IWR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWR has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IWR leads with 23.42% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWR has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.16% for IWR.
IWR is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWR and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWR and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer