PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWR vs. FTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWR vs. FTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than FTSIX's 14.68% return.


IWR

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.79%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.21%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.55%

FTSIX

1D
0.81%
1M
2.54%
YTD
14.68%
6M
14.78%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWR vs. FTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
12.43%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
14.68%6.04%11.86%18.52%-17.63%25.29%19.19%26.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and FTSIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019

0.94

The correlation between IWR and FTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWR vs. FTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSIX
FTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWR vs. FTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWRFTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.34

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

12.51

-2.23

IWR vs. FTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and FTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWRFTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.88

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.35

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.57

-0.07

Drawdowns

IWR vs. FTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than FTSIX's maximum drawdown of -42.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and FTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRFTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.78%

-42.12%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-6.80%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-23.30%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-27.57%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-7.65%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.35%

-0.24%

Volatility

IWR vs. FTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 3.26%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRFTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

4.28%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

11.11%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

15.75%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

19.09%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

23.34%

-3.98%

IWR vs. FTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSIX's 2.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWR vs. FTSIX - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than FTSIX's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
0.56%0.64%0.84%0.85%0.95%5.50%0.35%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.15%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IWR and FTSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTSIX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to IWR (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs FTSIX's -42.12%.

FTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWR and FTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer