PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWR vs. FTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWR vs. FTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly lower than FTSIX's 19.36% return.


IWR

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.59%
6M
11.19%
YTD
14.55%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
9.95%

FTSIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.52%
6M
13.40%
YTD
19.36%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$186.41M$266.84M$222.00M

IWR vs. FTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
14.55%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%0.93%
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
19.36%6.04%11.86%18.52%-17.63%25.29%19.19%26.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and FTSIX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.94

The correlation between IWR and FTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWR vs. FTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSIX
FTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWR vs. FTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWRFTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

4.06

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

11.85

-3.00

IWR vs. FTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and FTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWR vs. FTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than FTSIX's maximum drawdown of -42.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and FTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRFTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.78%

-42.12%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-6.80%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-23.30%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-27.57%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.99%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-7.51%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.33%

-0.23%

Volatility

IWR vs. FTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 2.48%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRFTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

3.65%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

11.26%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

15.57%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

19.03%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

23.18%

-3.87%

IWR vs. FTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSIX's 2.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWR vs. FTSIX - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than FTSIX's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
0.54%0.64%0.84%0.85%0.95%5.50%0.35%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.16%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IWR and FTSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTSIX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to IWR (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs FTSIX's -42.12%.

FTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWR and FTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer