PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSIX vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTSIX having a 19.36% return and VFVA slightly higher at 19.47%.


FTSIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.52%
6M
13.40%
YTD
19.36%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.53%

VFVA

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.08%
6M
14.51%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.76M$2.45M$1.67M

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
19.36%6.04%11.86%18.52%-17.63%25.29%19.19%26.72%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.47%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSIX and VFVA is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FTSIX and VFVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSIX vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTSIX
FTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTSIXVFVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

4.19

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

14.15

-2.30

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSIX and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSIX drawdown since its inception was -42.12%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSIX and VFVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSIXVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.12%

-48.58%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-8.55%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-24.07%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-24.07%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.29%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-7.24%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.52%

-0.19%

Volatility

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) is 3.65%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that FTSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSIXVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

4.31%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

10.12%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

14.96%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

20.05%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

24.20%

-1.02%

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSIX has a 2.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTSIX vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

FTSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VFVA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
0.54%0.64%0.84%0.85%0.95%5.50%0.35%2.16%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.77%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSIX and VFVA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFVA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to FTSIX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSIX dropped -42.12% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSIX and VFVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer