IWP vs. QQQ
IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWP returned 12.47%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWP charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IWP vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IWP has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.47%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.
IWP
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
IWP vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 2.86% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 35.04% | -4.89% | 24.93% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and QQQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2001 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IWP and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWP vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWP
QQQ
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Industrials
IWP
QQQ
Technology
IWP
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IWP
QQQ
Healthcare
IWP
QQQ
Financial Services
IWP
QQQ
Energy
IWP
QQQ
Communication Services
IWP
QQQ
Utilities
IWP
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IWP
QQQ
Real Estate
IWP
QQQ
Basic Materials
IWP
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWP vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IWP
QQQ
IWP vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 3.01 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 11.22 | -10.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWP vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -82.97% | +26.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -11.96% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.20% | -22.77% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.62% | -35.12% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -35.12% | -3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -3.33% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -32.75% | +23.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 3.20% | +1.90% |
Volatility
IWP vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is 5.68%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that IWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 7.56% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 13.81% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 17.19% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 22.55% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 22.38% | -0.67% |
IWP vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWP vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than QQQ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWP and QQQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to IWP (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWP dropped -56.92% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 12.47% for IWP. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWP has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWP.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
IWP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWP and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWP and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer