PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWO vs. DWAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWO vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 21.51% return, which is significantly lower than DWAS's 27.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IWO has underperformed DWAS with an annualized return of 12.48%, while DWAS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.


IWO

1D
0.75%
1M
3.34%
YTD
21.51%
6M
17.87%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
12.48%

DWAS

1D
2.34%
1M
5.71%
YTD
27.36%
6M
23.73%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
14.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWO vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
21.51%12.90%15.04%18.51%-26.27%2.54%34.68%28.48%-9.43%22.25%
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
27.36%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IWO and DWAS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012

0.93

The correlation between IWO and DWAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWO vs. DWAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWO
DWAS

Technology

25.9%
20.9%

Industrials

23.0%
18.0%

Healthcare

21.9%
25.9%

Financial Services

7.8%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.9%

Energy

3.1%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.2%

Utilities

0.6%
0.3%

Technology

IWO
25.9%
DWAS
20.9%

Industrials

IWO
23.0%
DWAS
18.0%

Healthcare

IWO
21.9%
DWAS
25.9%

Financial Services

IWO
7.8%
DWAS
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IWO
7.0%
DWAS
5.9%

Basic Materials

IWO
4.0%
DWAS
3.9%

Energy

IWO
3.1%
DWAS
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

IWO
2.3%
DWAS
3.0%

Communication Services

IWO
2.2%
DWAS
1.1%

Real Estate

IWO
2.0%
DWAS
1.2%

Utilities

IWO
0.6%
DWAS
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWO vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWO
IWO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWO vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWODWASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

4.83

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

15.55

-5.76

IWO vs. DWAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the DWAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWO and DWAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWO vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than DWAS's maximum drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and DWAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWODWASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-46.16%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-10.02%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.57%

-33.83%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.51%

-33.83%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-46.16%

+4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-10.26%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

3.10%

+1.06%

Volatility

IWO vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) is 7.60%, while Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that IWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWODWASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

8.83%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

18.16%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

24.03%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.64%

25.87%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.17%

26.69%

-2.52%

IWO vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWO vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison

IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.42%0.56%0.80%0.73%0.73%0.32%0.44%0.71%0.76%0.73%0.97%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IWO and DWAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DWAS has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to IWO (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs DWAS's -46.16%.

On 10-year performance, DWAS leads with 14.40% vs 12.48% for IWO. On fees, IWO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

IWO has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

IWO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.60% for DWAS.

DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWO and DWAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer