PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWO vs. SLYG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWO and SLYG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

IWO vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%350.00%400.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
322.42%
387.08%
IWO
SLYG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWO:

0.91

SLYG:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

IWO:

1.38

SLYG:

1.05

Omega Ratio

IWO:

1.16

SLYG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

IWO:

0.71

SLYG:

0.88

Martin Ratio

IWO:

4.62

SLYG:

3.63

Ulcer Index

IWO:

4.21%

SLYG:

3.47%

Daily Std Dev

IWO:

21.44%

SLYG:

19.18%

Max Drawdown

IWO:

-60.10%

SLYG:

-63.19%

Current Drawdown

IWO:

-11.28%

SLYG:

-9.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IWO has underperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 8.24%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


IWO

YTD

16.25%

1M

-2.52%

6M

12.37%

1Y

17.19%

5Y*

6.97%

10Y*

8.24%

SLYG

YTD

10.30%

1M

-6.11%

6M

8.29%

1Y

10.09%

5Y*

8.24%

10Y*

9.51%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWO vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWO: current value at 0.24% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.24%
Expense ratio chart for SLYG: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWO vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IWO, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.910.66
The chart of Sortino ratio for IWO, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.381.05
The chart of Omega ratio for IWO, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for IWO, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.710.88
The chart of Martin ratio for IWO, currently valued at 4.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.623.63
IWO
SLYG

The current IWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWO and SLYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.91
0.66
IWO
SLYG

Dividends

IWO vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than SLYG's 0.80% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.79%0.73%0.75%0.32%0.44%0.71%0.76%0.73%0.97%0.89%0.73%0.72%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.80%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%4.42%0.62%

Drawdowns

IWO vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYG drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and SLYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-11.28%
-9.12%
IWO
SLYG

Volatility

IWO vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.83%. This indicates that IWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.39%
5.83%
IWO
SLYG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab