IWO vs. SLYG
IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index while SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWO returned 11.39%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
IWO vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 16.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWO having a 11.39% annualized return and SLYG not far behind at 10.90%.
IWO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 18.82%
- 1Y
- 41.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- 28.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
IWO vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 18.42% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 34.68% | 28.48% | -9.43% | 22.25% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 16.17% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWO and SLYG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IWO and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWO vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWO
SLYG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
IWO
SLYG
Industrials
IWO
SLYG
Healthcare
IWO
SLYG
Financial Services
IWO
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
IWO
SLYG
Basic Materials
IWO
SLYG
Energy
IWO
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
IWO
SLYG
Communication Services
IWO
SLYG
Real Estate
IWO
SLYG
Utilities
IWO
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWO vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
IWO
SLYG
IWO vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.64 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 2.41 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.14 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 11.01 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.64 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.27 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.31 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
IWO vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -62.15% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.87% | -9.10% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.57% | -27.39% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | -29.18% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -41.86% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.84% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -14.55% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 2.60% | +1.54% |
Volatility
IWO vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 4.60%. This indicates that IWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWO | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 4.60% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 12.48% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.29% | 17.56% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 21.52% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 22.74% | +1.39% |
IWO vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWO vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than SLYG's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IWO and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWO has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SLYG (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs SLYG's -62.15%.
On 10-year performance, IWO leads with 11.39% vs 10.90% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWO has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.40% for IWO.
IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.15% for SLYG.
IWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWO and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer