IWN vs. SOXX
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.09%/yr vs 34.00%/yr for SOXX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
IWN vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 84.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 10.09%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.00% annualized return.
IWN
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- YTD
- 22.06%
- 1Y
- 35.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
SOXX
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- 67.77%
- YTD
- 84.03%
- 1Y
- 125.94%
- 3Y*
- 48.43%
- 5Y*
- 31.11%
- 10Y*
- 34.00%
IWN vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 22.06% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 84.03% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and SOXX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IWN and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWN vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWN
SOXX
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
IWN
SOXX
-
Industrials
IWN
SOXX
-
Technology
IWN
SOXX
Real Estate
IWN
SOXX
-
Healthcare
IWN
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWN
SOXX
-
Energy
IWN
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
IWN
SOXX
-
Utilities
IWN
SOXX
-
Communication Services
IWN
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
IWN
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
SOXX
IWN vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 8.03 | -3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | 25.14 | -10.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWN vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -70.21% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -15.77% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -41.36% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -45.75% | +19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | -45.75% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -15.48% | +14.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -19.92% | +9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 5.03% | -2.53% |
Volatility
IWN vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 3.77%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.50%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 22.50% | -18.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 36.44% | -24.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.67% | 42.11% | -24.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 37.77% | -16.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 34.27% | -10.94% |
IWN vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWN vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and SOXX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.50%) compared to IWN (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.00% vs 10.09% for IWN. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.00% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.
IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer