IWN vs. IWMY
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWN returned 42.26% vs 21.26% for IWMY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
IWN vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than IWMY's 13.70% return.
IWN
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 42.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
IWMY
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWN vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 23.56% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 13.70% | 10.18% | 5.56% | 10.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and IWMY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IWN and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
IWMY
IWN vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWN | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.23 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 1.85 | +3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | 6.03 | +10.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWN vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -18.72% | -42.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -11.57% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -2.96% | -7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.54% | -1.03% |
Volatility
IWN vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 5.80%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 6.80% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 13.47% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 16.36% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 15.94% | +5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 15.94% | +7.47% |
IWN vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWN vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than IWMY's 44.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 44.61% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and IWMY have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMY has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to IWN (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs IWMY's -18.72%.
On 1-year performance, IWN leads with 42.26% vs 21.26% for IWMY. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWN has performed better with a 42.26% return vs 21.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 44.61%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.
IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.99% for IWMY.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer