IWMY vs. BAC
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) is Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while BAC (Bank of America Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, IWMY returned 21.26% vs 29.23% for BAC. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IWMY vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 3.72% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
IWMY vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 13.70% | 10.18% | 5.56% | 10.06% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 32.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and BAC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between IWMY and BAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
BAC
IWMY vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWMY | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.64 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 4.21 | +1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -93.10% | +74.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -17.93% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.36% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -28.30% | +25.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 6.96% | -3.42% |
Volatility
IWMY vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.49%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 5.49% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 16.57% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 21.62% | -5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 26.89% | -10.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 30.68% | -14.74% |
Dividends
IWMY vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.61%, more than BAC's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 44.61% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and BAC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMY has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs BAC's -93.10%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer