PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMW vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWMW vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWMW vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
-0.04%7.82%6.09%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.17%4.25%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMW achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's 0.17% return.


IWMW

1D
2.35%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
1.69%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
0.17%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
-2.78%
5Y*
-5.85%
10Y*
-1.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMW vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWMW vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMW
IWMW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IWMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMW Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMW vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMWTLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

-0.04

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

0.02

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.00

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.05

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.44

0.11

+4.33

IWMW vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMW Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMW and TLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMWTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

-0.04

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.26

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between IWMW and TLT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IWMW vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

IWMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.56%, more than TLT's 4.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
22.56%20.98%17.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.49%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Drawdowns

IWMW vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMW drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMW and TLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMWTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-48.35%

+26.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-9.23%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.76%

-40.17%

+35.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-13.62%

+9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

4.38%

-1.32%

Volatility

IWMW vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 3.71%. This indicates that IWMW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWMWTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

3.71%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

6.61%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

11.44%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

15.90%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

14.93%

+1.64%