PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWMW vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IWMWVOO
Daily Std Dev14.06%12.63%
Max Drawdown-8.36%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-1.33%-0.28%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between IWMW and VOO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

IWMW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.49%
8.62%
IWMW
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWMW: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWMW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMW
Sharpe ratio
No data
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 12.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.14

IWMW vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

IWMW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IWMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than VOO's 1.28% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
8.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.28%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

IWMW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMW drawdown since its inception was -8.36%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMW and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-1.33%
-0.28%
IWMW
VOO

Volatility

IWMW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) is 2.38%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that IWMW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.38%
3.92%
IWMW
VOO