PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWL vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWL vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.26% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 16.38%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.54% annualized return.


IWL

1D
0.44%
1M
4.89%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.48%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
16.38%

SOXX

1D
-2.10%
1M
24.86%
YTD
100.26%
6M
97.20%
1Y
179.78%
3Y*
57.09%
5Y*
33.93%
10Y*
35.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWL vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
10.51%19.09%27.12%29.77%-19.89%27.79%22.10%31.42%-3.30%22.90%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
100.26%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IWL and SOXX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.73

The correlation between IWL and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWL vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWL
SOXX

Technology

40.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

12.2%

-

Financial Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

6.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

2.5%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

IWL
40.9%
SOXX
100.0%

Communication Services

IWL
12.2%
SOXX

-

Financial Services

IWL
11.3%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWL
9.6%
SOXX

-

Healthcare

IWL
8.5%
SOXX

-

Industrials

IWL
6.1%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

IWL
4.7%
SOXX

-

Energy

IWL
2.5%
SOXX

-

Utilities

IWL
1.7%
SOXX

-

Basic Materials

IWL
1.4%
SOXX

-

Real Estate

IWL
1.0%
SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWL vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWL
IWL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWL vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWLSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.71

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

11.48

-8.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

43.90

-30.77

IWL vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWL Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 5.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWL and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWLSOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

5.29

-2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.94

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

1.07

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.44

+0.44

Drawdowns

IWL vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWLSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-70.21%

+37.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-15.77%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-41.36%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.65%

-45.75%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-45.75%

+13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-2.10%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-19.97%

+16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.11%

-1.90%

Volatility

IWL vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 2.95%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWLSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

14.08%

-11.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

27.45%

-18.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

34.20%

-22.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

36.11%

-18.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

33.43%

-15.35%

IWL vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWL vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
0.82%0.90%1.04%1.30%1.54%1.12%1.30%1.96%1.93%1.69%1.96%2.14%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWL and SOXX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to IWL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.54% vs 16.38% for IWL. On fees, IWL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 16.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.

IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.

IWL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWL and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer