IWL vs. FIDU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Index, while FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWL returned 16.17%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for FIDU. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.

Performance

IWL vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has outperformed FIDU with an annualized return of 16.17%, while FIDU has yielded a comparatively lower 14.15% annualized return.

IWL

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 14.18%
• 10Y*: 16.17%

FIDU

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 21.68%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 14.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWL vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	7.88%	19.09%	27.12%	29.77%	-19.89%	27.79%	22.10%	31.42%	-3.30%	22.90%
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	14.14%	18.61%	16.51%	22.62%	-8.36%	20.96%	13.72%	30.69%	-13.85%	22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IWL and FIDU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.79

The correlation between IWL and FIDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWL vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWL	FIDU
Technology	38.2%	6.4%
Communication Services	12.9%	0.0%
Financial Services	12.0%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	1.0%
Healthcare	8.8%	0.0%
Industrials	6.8%	92.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Energy	2.7%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.2%
Utilities	1.3%	0.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

IWL vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWL

IWL Risk / Return Rank: 66
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FIDU

FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 48
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWL vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWL	FIDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.51	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.20	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.26	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.04	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	8.40	+2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWL vs. FIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWL Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the FIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWL and FIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWL	FIDU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.51	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.71	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.70	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.66	+0.22

Drawdowns

IWL vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and FIDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWL	FIDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.71%	-42.31%	+9.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-12.23%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-20.52%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.65%	-22.87%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.71%	-42.31%	+9.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-1.95%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-4.80%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.96%	-0.73%

Volatility

IWL vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 3.99%, while Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWL	FIDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	4.59%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.60%	13.60%	-4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.50%	16.59%	-4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	18.29%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	20.32%	-2.21%

IWL vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWL vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison

IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FIDU's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	0.96%	1.02%	1.42%	1.42%	1.48%	1.12%	1.28%	1.73%	1.99%	1.60%	1.63%	1.98%
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	0.84%	0.90%	1.04%	1.30%	1.54%	1.12%	1.30%	1.96%	1.93%	1.69%	1.96%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWL and FIDU in my portfolio?

IWL and FIDU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWL or FIDU?

FIDU has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to IWL (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs FIDU's -42.31%.

Which ETF is better, IWL or FIDU?

On 10-year performance, IWL leads with 16.17% vs 14.15% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IWL has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWL or FIDU?

Over the 10-year period, IWL has performed better with a 16.17% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWL or FIDU?

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWL or FIDU?

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.84% for IWL.

What is the main difference between IWL and FIDU?

IWL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FIDU is Industrials Equities. IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.08% for FIDU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.