IWL vs. AVLC
IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and AVLC (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Index, while AVLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century. IWL is passively managed, while AVLC is actively managed. Over the past year, IWL returned 28.50% vs 32.71% for AVLC. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IWL vs. AVLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than AVLC's 14.81% return.
IWL
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
AVLC
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWL vs. AVLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 10.03% | 19.09% | 27.12% | 11.48% |
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 14.81% | 17.57% | 22.82% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and AVLC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IWL and AVLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWL vs. AVLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWL
AVLC
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
IWL
AVLC
Communication Services
IWL
AVLC
Financial Services
IWL
AVLC
Consumer Cyclical
IWL
AVLC
Healthcare
IWL
AVLC
Industrials
IWL
AVLC
Consumer Defensive
IWL
AVLC
Energy
IWL
AVLC
Utilities
IWL
AVLC
Basic Materials
IWL
AVLC
Real Estate
IWL
AVLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWL vs. AVLC — Risk / Return Rank
IWL
AVLC
IWL vs. AVLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWL | AVLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 2.65 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 3.59 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 4.11 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | 18.96 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWL | AVLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.65 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.67 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. AVLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, which is greater than AVLC's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and AVLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWL | AVLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -19.64% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -8.00% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.43% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -1.97% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.73% | +0.48% |
Volatility
IWL vs. AVLC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) have volatilities of 2.98% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWL | AVLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.02% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 9.25% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 12.40% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 15.69% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 15.69% | +2.39% |
IWL vs. AVLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWL and AVLC have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWL vs. AVLC - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than AVLC's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.78% | 0.92% | 1.09% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IWL and AVLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVLC has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to IWL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs AVLC's -19.64%.
On 1-year performance, AVLC leads with 32.71% vs 28.50% for IWL. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVLC has performed better with a 32.71% return vs 28.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWL and AVLC have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.78% for AVLC.
IWL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century.
AVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWL and AVLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer