PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWIRX vs. ICHKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWIRX achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly higher than ICHKX's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IWIRX has outperformed ICHKX with an annualized return of 13.48%, while ICHKX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.


IWIRX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.73%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.89%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
13.48%

ICHKX

1D
1.68%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.81%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
-6.01%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWIRX
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund
5.43%19.93%19.47%39.36%-29.72%4.85%36.21%37.05%-16.90%34.77%
ICHKX
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
0.74%28.97%0.05%-14.52%-23.67%-6.90%14.58%30.08%-20.50%49.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IWIRX and ICHKX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1998

0.47

The correlation between IWIRX and ICHKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWIRX vs. ICHKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWIRX
IWIRX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IWIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IWIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ICHKX
ICHKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ICHKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICHKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICHKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ICHKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICHKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWIRXICHKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.94

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

5.34

+1.24

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the ICHKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWIRX and ICHKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWIRXICHKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

-0.25

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.19

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.20

+0.19

Drawdowns

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWIRX drawdown since its inception was -70.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ICHKX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWIRX and ICHKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWIRXICHKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.99%

-70.67%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.03%

-10.19%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.26%

-28.10%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.99%

-52.70%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.99%

-58.39%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.90%

+35.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-27.21%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.69%

-0.53%

Volatility

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) is 3.58%, while Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that IWIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICHKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWIRXICHKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

5.56%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

10.96%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

15.86%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.36%

23.68%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

22.43%

+0.37%

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWIRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ICHKX's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWIRX vs. ICHKX - Dividend Comparison

IWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.93%, more than ICHKX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICHKX
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
1.05%1.06%1.11%0.74%0.86%20.44%3.57%4.37%12.53%6.76%5.31%12.25%
IWIRX
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund
15.93%16.79%12.54%3.85%12.52%2.58%2.65%4.54%7.63%2.27%0.92%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWIRX and ICHKX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICHKX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to IWIRX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWIRX dropped -70.99% vs ICHKX's -70.67%.

IWIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWIRX and ICHKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer