IWIRX vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).
IWIRX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Dec 15, 1998. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
IWIRX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWIRX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWIRX Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund | -6.14% | 19.93% | 19.47% | 39.36% | -29.72% | 4.85% | 36.21% | 37.05% | -16.90% | 34.77% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.18% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWIRX having a -6.14% return and XLK slightly lower at -6.18%. Over the past 10 years, IWIRX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.26%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.
IWIRX
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -6.14%
- 6M
- -4.37%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.65%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWIRX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWIRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWIRX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IWIRX
XLK
IWIRX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWIRX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.13 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.71 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.97 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 6.31 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWIRX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.13 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.64 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.87 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.36 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWIRX and XLK is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWIRX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.89%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWIRX Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund | 17.89% | 16.79% | 12.54% | 3.85% | 12.52% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 4.54% | 7.63% | 2.27% | 0.92% | 4.77% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
IWIRX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWIRX drawdown since its inception was -70.99%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWIRX and XLK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWIRX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.99% | -82.05% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.55% | -15.92% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.99% | -33.56% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.99% | -33.56% | -11.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -11.04% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.43% | -35.17% | +13.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.98% | -1.60% |
Volatility
IWIRX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) is 6.21%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that IWIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWIRX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 8.12% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 16.49% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.82% | 27.05% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 24.72% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 24.33% | -1.55% |