IWFL vs. HOOG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG).

IWFL and HOOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth (200%). It was launched on Feb 5, 2021. HOOG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

IWFL vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWFL vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWFL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN	-19.22%	43.01%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-67.70%	291.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFL achieves a -19.22% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -67.70% return.

IWFL

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: -7.96%
• YTD: -19.22%
• 6M: -19.55%
• 1Y: 20.29%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: -24.23%
• YTD: -67.70%
• 6M: -82.07%
• 1Y: 43.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFL vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

IWFL

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN

HOOG

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

IWFL vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFL

IWFL Risk / Return Rank: 27
IWFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
IWFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
IWFL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
IWFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
IWFL Martin Ratio Rank: 25

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 32
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFL vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWFL	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.30	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	1.50	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.18	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	0.53	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.10	1.11	+0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWFL vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFL and HOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWFL	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	0.30	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.18	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between IWFL and HOOG is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IWFL vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

IWFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.10%.

	TTM	2025
IWFL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	38.10%	12.30%

Drawdowns

IWFL vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFL drawdown since its inception was -59.29%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFL and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFL	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.29%	-86.94%	+27.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.80%	-86.94%	+54.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.44%	-84.94%	+59.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.34%	-30.17%	+9.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.42%	41.37%	-30.95%

Volatility

IWFL vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) is 15.30%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.44%. This indicates that IWFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWFL	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.30%	35.44%	-20.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.03%	100.78%	-73.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.74%	143.11%	-87.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.76%	143.62%	-96.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.77%	143.62%	-96.85%