IWFH vs. SMH
IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWFH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
IWFH vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IWFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -9.22%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 58.19%
- 6M
- 56.81%
- 1Y
- 127.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.39%
- 5Y*
- 36.10%
- 10Y*
- 36.02%
IWFH vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -7.41% | 17.42% | -39.32% | -25.56% | 15.64% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 58.19% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 23.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFH and SMH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020 | 0.53 |
The correlation between IWFH and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWFH vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWFH
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IWFH
SMH
Communication Services
IWFH
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWFH
SMH
-
Healthcare
IWFH
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
IWFH
SMH
-
Basic Materials
IWFH
-
SMH
-
Energy
IWFH
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
IWFH
-
SMH
-
Industrials
IWFH
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
IWFH
-
SMH
-
Utilities
IWFH
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWFH vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
IWFH
SMH
IWFH vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWFH | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.32 | — |
Drawdowns
IWFH vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFH | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -84.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -10.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -41.08% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility
IWFH vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWFH | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 32.03% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 35.24% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 32.70% | — |
IWFH vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWFH vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.83% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWFH and SMH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.
IWFH is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for IWFH and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer