IWFG vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWFG (NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFG charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

IWFG vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFG

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 4.54%
• YTD: 2.57%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 11.70%
• 3Y*: 23.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFG vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	-0.12%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFG and GRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.70

IWFG vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFG	GRW
Technology	52.4%	26.6%
Communication Services	13.3%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	8.3%
Industrials	7.5%	38.1%
Healthcare	5.5%	4.1%
Financial Services	4.8%	9.8%
Utilities	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

IWFG vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFG

IWFG Risk / Return Rank: 19
IWFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
IWFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
IWFG Omega Ratio Rank: 21
IWFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
IWFG Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFG vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWFG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWFG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	13.58	-12.41

Drawdowns

IWFG vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFG drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFG and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFG	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.97%	-0.45%	-21.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-0.27%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-0.17%	-3.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFG	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	8.89%	+7.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.47%	8.89%	+11.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.47%	8.89%	+11.58%

IWFG vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFG vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFG nor GRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	5.44%	1.01%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWFG and GRW in my portfolio?

IWFG and GRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWFG or GRW?

On fees, IWFG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFG or GRW?

IWFG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFG or GRW?

IWFG and GRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IWFG and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: New York Life and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IWFG and 0.75% for GRW.