IWB vs. STRN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. IWB is passively managed, while STRN is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.

Performance

IWB vs. STRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly lower than STRN's 19.31% return.

IWB

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: 8.70%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: 14.80%

STRN

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -6.46%
• 6M: 14.02%
• YTD: 19.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWB vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	10.52%	6.91%
STRN SMART Trend ETF	19.31%	10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IWB and STRN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

IWB vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWB

IWB Risk / Return Rank: 63
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

STRN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWB vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWB	STRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	—	—

Drawdowns

IWB vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than STRN's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and STRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWB	STRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.38%	-15.43%	-39.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-8.89%	+8.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-3.00%	-7.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWB	STRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	26.85%	-14.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	26.85%	-9.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.12%	26.85%	-8.73%

IWB vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWB vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison

IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	0.92%	1.00%	1.14%	1.31%	1.56%	1.09%	1.37%	1.71%	2.06%	1.64%	1.89%	1.95%
STRN SMART Trend ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWB and STRN in my portfolio?

IWB and STRN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWB or STRN?

On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWB or STRN?

IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for STRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWB or STRN?

IWB has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.

What is the main difference between IWB and STRN?

IWB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.59% for STRN.