IWB vs. SLV
IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWB returned 15.25%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IWB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IWB has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 15.25%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.
IWB
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
SLV
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- -13.49%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- 69.08%
- 3Y*
- 39.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
IWB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 8.01% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 21.52% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -13.49% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWB and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.21 |
The correlation between IWB and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IWB
SLV
IWB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.47 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.56 | 3.16 | +8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -76.28% | +20.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -47.23% | +38.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | -47.23% | +28.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -47.23% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | -47.23% | +12.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -47.23% | +44.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -44.65% | +33.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 21.91% | -19.92% |
Volatility
IWB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is 4.84%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that IWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 14.34% | -9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 59.27% | -49.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 60.33% | -47.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 36.59% | -19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 32.09% | -13.94% |
IWB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWB and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to IWB (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, IWB leads with 15.25% vs 12.68% for SLV. On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWB has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWB has performed better with a 15.25% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IWB has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IWB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SLV is Silver. IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.50% for SLV.
IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWB and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer