IWB vs. PSHZF
IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while PSHZF (Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IWB returned 15.25%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for PSHZF. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IWB vs. PSHZF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than PSHZF's -23.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IWB has outperformed PSHZF with an annualized return of 15.25%, while PSHZF has yielded a comparatively lower 14.35% annualized return.
IWB
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
PSHZF
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -10.58%
- YTD
- -23.27%
- 6M
- -23.38%
- 1Y
- -1.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
IWB vs. PSHZF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 8.01% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 21.52% |
PSHZF Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. | -23.27% | 36.74% | 4.57% | 37.43% | -15.13% | 17.80% | 89.27% | 53.54% | -8.09% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWB and PSHZF is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2015 | 0.44 |
The correlation between IWB and PSHZF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWB vs. PSHZF — Risk / Return Rank
IWB
PSHZF
IWB vs. PSHZF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. (PSHZF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWB | PSHZF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.01 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | -0.05 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.56 | -0.12 | +11.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWB vs. PSHZF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, roughly equal to the maximum PSHZF drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and PSHZF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWB | PSHZF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -56.97% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -25.79% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | -25.79% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -31.46% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | -32.96% | -1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -25.79% | +22.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -23.14% | +12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 11.22% | -9.23% |
Volatility
IWB vs. PSHZF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is 4.84%, while Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. (PSHZF) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that IWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSHZF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWB | PSHZF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 7.69% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 18.14% | -8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 23.14% | -10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 24.49% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 25.14% | -6.99% |
Dividends
IWB vs. PSHZF - Dividend Comparison
IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than PSHZF's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
PSHZF Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. | 1.40% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.14% | 1.35% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWB and PSHZF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSHZF has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to IWB (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs PSHZF's -56.97%.
IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWB and PSHZF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer