PSHZF vs. BHMG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) and BH Macro Limited (BHMG.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSHZF or BHMG.L.
Key characteristics
| PSHZF | BHMG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.72% | 1.23% |
| 1Y Return | 24.96% | 1.92% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.82% | -0.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.57% | 6.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.17 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.65 | 0.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.02 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.35 | 0.01 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.06 | 0.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.31% | 5.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.65% | 16.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.97% | -99.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.24% | -99.96% |
Fundamentals
| PSHZF | BHMG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.71B | £1.38B |
| EPS | $12.24 | £0.10 |
| PE Ratio | 3.68 | 37.15 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.87B | £6.14M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.47B | £6.14M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $59.93M | £49.45M |
Correlation
The correlation between PSHZF and BHMG.L is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PSHZF vs. BHMG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PSHZF achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than BHMG.L's 1.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSHZF vs. BHMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) and BH Macro Limited (BHMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSHZF vs. BHMG.L - Dividend Comparison
PSHZF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while BHMG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSHZF Pershing Square Holdings Ltd | 1.26% | 1.12% | 1.16% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 2.09% |
BHMG.L BH Macro Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PSHZF vs. BHMG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSHZF drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, smaller than the maximum BHMG.L drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSHZF and BHMG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSHZF vs. BHMG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) is 6.02%, while BH Macro Limited (BHMG.L) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that PSHZF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHMG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PSHZF vs. BHMG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pershing Square Holdings Ltd and BH Macro Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities