IWB vs. IBIT
IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWB returned 27.03% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IWB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
IWB
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 27.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 10.54% | 17.18% | 24.25% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWB and IBIT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IWB
IBIT
IWB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.86 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.79 | +3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.09 | -1.36 | +15.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | -0.89 | +3.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.30 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
IWB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -49.36% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -49.36% | +40.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -48.10% | +47.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -16.02% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 28.44% | -26.52% |
Volatility
IWB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is 2.88%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 9.50% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 34.44% | -25.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 43.73% | -31.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 50.19% | -33.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 50.19% | -32.05% |
IWB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IWB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWB dropped -55.38% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IWB leads with 27.03% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWB has performed better with a 27.03% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IWB has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IWB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.25% for IBIT.
IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWB and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer