IWB vs. BLCV
IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) and BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while BLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. IWB is passively managed, while BLCV is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BLCV.
Performance
IWB vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IWB
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
BLCV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWB vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 10.28% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 15.35% |
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 6.47% | 19.96% | 12.63% | 14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWB and BLCV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IWB and BLCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWB vs. BLCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWB
BLCV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
IWB
BLCV
Financial Services
IWB
BLCV
Communication Services
IWB
BLCV
Consumer Cyclical
IWB
BLCV
Industrials
IWB
BLCV
Healthcare
IWB
BLCV
Consumer Defensive
IWB
BLCV
Energy
IWB
BLCV
Real Estate
IWB
BLCV
Utilities
IWB
BLCV
Basic Materials
IWB
BLCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWB vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank
IWB
BLCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWB vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWB | BLCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWB vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWB | BLCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility
IWB vs. BLCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWB | BLCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | — | — |
IWB vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWB vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison
IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 1.01% | 1.37% | 1.63% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWB and BLCV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.
BLCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.92% for IWB.
IWB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BLCV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWB and 0.55% for BLCV.
Find the right allocation for IWB and BLCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer