PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVW vs. WBIY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVW vs. WBIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly higher than WBIY's 10.76% return.


IVW

1D
-0.05%
1M
6.45%
YTD
13.62%
6M
12.96%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
18.02%

WBIY

1D
0.69%
1M
2.63%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.81%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVW vs. WBIY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.62%21.95%35.82%29.83%-29.50%31.80%33.19%30.77%-0.21%27.21%
WBIY
WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF
10.76%13.00%8.36%13.80%-0.52%28.35%-8.48%24.82%-14.47%14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IVW and WBIY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2016

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between IVW and WBIY has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IVW vs. WBIY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVW
WBIY

Technology

49.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

18.0%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
13.1%

Financial Services

8.9%
18.7%

Industrials

6.2%
9.4%

Healthcare

5.8%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
16.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.1%

Utilities

0.4%
6.1%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.9%

Energy

0.1%
6.0%

Technology

IVW
49.3%
WBIY
10.1%

Communication Services

IVW
18.0%
WBIY
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVW
9.4%
WBIY
13.1%

Financial Services

IVW
8.9%
WBIY
18.7%

Industrials

IVW
6.2%
WBIY
9.4%

Healthcare

IVW
5.8%
WBIY
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

IVW
1.0%
WBIY
16.4%

Real Estate

IVW
0.6%
WBIY
1.1%

Utilities

IVW
0.4%
WBIY
6.1%

Basic Materials

IVW
0.4%
WBIY
1.9%

Energy

IVW
0.1%
WBIY
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVW vs. WBIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVW
IVW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

WBIY
WBIY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
WBIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVW vs. WBIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVWWBIYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.16

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

10.49

-0.39

IVW vs. WBIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the WBIY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVW and WBIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVWWBIYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.83

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.50

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.38

+0.07

Drawdowns

IVW vs. WBIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, which is greater than WBIY's maximum drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and WBIY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVWWBIYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.33%

-48.71%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-6.63%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.15%

-19.37%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-20.97%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.15%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.61%

-7.11%

-10.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.62%

+0.70%

Volatility

IVW vs. WBIY - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) at 3.67%. This indicates that IVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVWWBIYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.67%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

8.92%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

15.07%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

18.51%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

22.65%

-2.04%

IVW vs. WBIY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIY's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVW vs. WBIY - Dividend Comparison

IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than WBIY's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.35%0.40%0.43%1.03%0.92%0.46%0.82%1.63%1.28%1.30%1.51%1.51%
WBIY
WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF
4.38%4.73%4.57%4.87%4.40%3.94%5.10%4.54%3.25%5.84%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVW and WBIY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVW has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to WBIY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs WBIY's -48.71%.

On 5-year performance, IVW leads with 15.92% vs 9.29% for WBIY. On fees, IVW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WBIY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVW has performed better with a 15.92% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for WBIY.

WBIY has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.

IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WBIY is Mid Cap Value Equities. IVW tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while WBIY tracks Solactive Power Factor High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.97% for WBIY.

IVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVW and WBIY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer