IVVM vs. TLT
IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVVM is a Options Trading fund actively managed by iShares, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. IVVM is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVVM returned 13.47%/yr vs -1.80%/yr for TLT. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IVVM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
IVVM vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVM achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return.
IVVM
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $740.71K | $781.13K | $703.06K | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
IVVM vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 6.70% | 14.24% | 16.08% | 5.17% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -3.49% | 4.25% | -8.05% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVM and TLT is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVVM vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IVVM
TLT
IVVM vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVVM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.99 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | -0.14 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | -0.30 | +12.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVVM vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -48.35% | +36.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -7.74% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -14.79% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -42.36% | +41.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -13.99% | +13.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 3.57% | -2.47% |
Volatility
IVVM vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) is 2.14%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that IVVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVVM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.46% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 6.85% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 9.32% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 15.74% | -6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 14.83% | -5.33% |
IVVM vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVVM vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVVM and TLT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to IVVM (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVM dropped -11.62% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 3-year performance, IVVM leads with 13.47% vs -1.80% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IVVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IVVM has performed better with a 13.47% return vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IVVM.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.64% for IVVM.
IVVM is categorized as Options Trading, while TLT is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVM and 0.15% for TLT.
IVVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVVM and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer