IVVM vs. SCHG
IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVVM is a Options Trading fund actively managed by iShares, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. IVVM is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVVM returned 13.47%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IVVM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
IVVM vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVM achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return.
IVVM
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
SCHG
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $740.71K | $781.13K | $703.06K | |
| $247.66M | $249.87M | $339.91M |
IVVM vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 6.70% | 14.24% | 16.08% | 5.17% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.99% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 12.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVM and SCHG is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IVVM and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVVM vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
IVVM
SCHG
IVVM vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVVM | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 0.83 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 2.62 | +9.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVVM vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVM | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -34.59% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -16.41% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -23.39% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -3.10% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -5.19% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 5.19% | -4.09% |
Volatility
IVVM vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) is 2.14%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that IVVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVVM | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 4.32% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 12.90% | -7.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 16.67% | -9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 22.42% | -12.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 21.59% | -12.09% |
IVVM vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVVM vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IVVM and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to IVVM (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVM dropped -11.62% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 21.39% vs 13.47% for IVVM. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IVVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 21.39% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IVVM.
IVVM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
IVVM is categorized as Options Trading, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVM and 0.04% for SCHG.
IVVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVVM and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer