IVV vs. SPYG
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.54%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
IVV vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 15.54%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
IVV vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and SPYG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IVV and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVV vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
SPYG
Financial Services
IVV
SPYG
Communication Services
IVV
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
SPYG
Healthcare
IVV
SPYG
Industrials
IVV
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
IVV
SPYG
Energy
IVV
SPYG
Utilities
IVV
SPYG
Real Estate
IVV
SPYG
Basic Materials
IVV
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
SPYG
IVV vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.48 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.71 | 10.25 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.12 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.76 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.88 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
IVV vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -67.63% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -13.76% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -22.14% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -32.67% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -32.67% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.13% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -24.33% | +13.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 3.32% | -1.41% |
Volatility
IVV vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.87%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 4.35% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 12.46% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 16.06% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 21.17% | -4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 20.64% | -2.59% |
IVV vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IVV and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 15.54% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 15.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYG.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.04% for SPYG.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer