PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRA vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRA vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IVRA

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLG

1D
-1.21%
1M
-1.02%
6M
4.65%
YTD
4.04%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
16.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRA vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
11.70%10.20%13.07%9.13%-10.00%32.74%1.28%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
4.04%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and XLG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020

0.45

The correlation between IVRA and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVRA vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVRA
XLG

Real Estate

46.8%

-

Energy

23.5%
2.2%

Basic Materials

14.3%
0.6%

Utilities

10.3%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
5.0%

Financial Services

0.7%
9.9%

Communication Services

-

13.9%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Industrials

-

2.1%

Technology

-

48.7%

Real Estate

IVRA
46.8%
XLG

-

Energy

IVRA
23.5%
XLG
2.2%

Basic Materials

IVRA
14.3%
XLG
0.6%

Utilities

IVRA
10.3%
XLG
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVRA
2.6%
XLG
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

IVRA
1.7%
XLG
5.0%

Financial Services

IVRA
0.7%
XLG
9.9%

Communication Services

IVRA

-

XLG
13.9%

Healthcare

IVRA

-

XLG
6.7%

Industrials

IVRA

-

XLG
2.1%

Technology

IVRA

-

XLG
48.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRA vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRA vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVRAXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

IVRA vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVRA vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRAXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

Volatility

IVRA vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRAXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

IVRA vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRA vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
16.80%5.68%3.71%2.47%2.30%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.65%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRA and XLG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while XLG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.20% for XLG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRA and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer