IVRA vs. SDMF
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while SDMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index. IVRA is actively managed, while SDMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDMF.
Performance
IVRA vs. SDMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IVRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVRA vs. SDMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | -0.22% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and SDMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. SDMF — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
SDMF
IVRA vs. SDMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRA | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRA | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.93 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. SDMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRA drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than SDMF's maximum drawdown of -6.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRA and SDMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -6.23% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -2.26% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | — | — |
Volatility
IVRA vs. SDMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 13.27% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 13.27% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 13.27% | +3.12% |
IVRA vs. SDMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. SDMF - Dividend Comparison
IVRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, while SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.99% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and SDMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
IVRA is categorized as ESG, while SDMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.35% for SDMF.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and SDMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer