IVOO vs. GRPM
IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) and GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while GRPM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOO returned 11.22%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for GRPM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GRPM.
Performance
IVOO vs. GRPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than GRPM's 7.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOO having a 11.22% annualized return and GRPM not far behind at 10.99%.
IVOO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
GRPM
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
IVOO vs. GRPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.13% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 7.11% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 26.35% | 15.60% | 23.05% | -12.45% | 13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOO and GRPM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IVOO and GRPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOO vs. GRPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOO
GRPM
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
IVOO
GRPM
Technology
IVOO
GRPM
Financial Services
IVOO
GRPM
Consumer Cyclical
IVOO
GRPM
Healthcare
IVOO
GRPM
Real Estate
IVOO
GRPM
-
Energy
IVOO
GRPM
Basic Materials
IVOO
GRPM
-
Consumer Defensive
IVOO
GRPM
Utilities
IVOO
GRPM
-
Communication Services
IVOO
GRPM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOO vs. GRPM — Risk / Return Rank
IVOO
GRPM
IVOO vs. GRPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOO | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.89 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 8.54 | +2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOO | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.37 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.37 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
IVOO vs. GRPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, roughly equal to the maximum GRPM drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and GRPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOO | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -43.12% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -7.62% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.22% | -28.09% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -28.09% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -43.12% | +0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.11% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -5.71% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.57% | -0.16% |
Volatility
IVOO vs. GRPM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) at 3.82%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOO | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 3.82% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 10.44% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 16.13% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 20.90% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 22.25% | -1.06% |
IVOO vs. GRPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GRPM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOO vs. GRPM - Dividend Comparison
IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than GRPM's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOO and GRPM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GRPM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs GRPM's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 11.22% vs 10.99% for GRPM. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 11.22% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.
IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.96% for GRPM.
IVOO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GRPM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOO and 0.35% for GRPM.
IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOO and GRPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer