PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOO vs. FLQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOO vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than FLQS's 7.01% return.


IVOO

1D
0.86%
1M
3.31%
YTD
14.15%
6M
15.23%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.22%

FLQS

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
7.01%
6M
8.10%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOO vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.15%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%11.00%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
7.01%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOO and FLQS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.87

The correlation between IVOO and FLQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOO vs. FLQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOO
FLQS

Industrials

25.1%
16.3%

Technology

15.7%
17.1%

Financial Services

14.4%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
15.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.6%

Real Estate

7.5%
6.7%

Energy

5.5%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.8%

Utilities

3.1%
5.8%

Communication Services

1.0%
1.9%

Industrials

IVOO
25.1%
FLQS
16.3%

Technology

IVOO
15.7%
FLQS
17.1%

Financial Services

IVOO
14.4%
FLQS
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOO
10.7%
FLQS
15.6%

Healthcare

IVOO
8.6%
FLQS
9.6%

Real Estate

IVOO
7.5%
FLQS
6.7%

Energy

IVOO
5.5%
FLQS
4.6%

Basic Materials

IVOO
4.8%
FLQS
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

IVOO
3.8%
FLQS
7.8%

Utilities

IVOO
3.1%
FLQS
5.8%

Communication Services

IVOO
1.0%
FLQS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOO vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOO vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOOFLQSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.04

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

1.62

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.69

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.19

4.98

+6.22

IVOO vs. FLQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the FLQS Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOO and FLQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOOFLQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.04

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.29

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.38

+0.24

Drawdowns

IVOO vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and FLQS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOOFLQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-42.16%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-9.00%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-23.12%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-28.05%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-8.02%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.05%

-0.64%

Volatility

IVOO vs. FLQS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) at 4.16%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOOFLQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.16%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

10.23%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

15.20%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

19.24%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

21.68%

-0.48%

IVOO vs. FLQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVOO vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison

IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than FLQS's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.34%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%0.00%0.00%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOO and FLQS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to FLQS (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs FLQS's -42.16%.

On 5-year performance, IVOO leads with 8.27% vs 5.50% for FLQS. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 8.27% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.19% for IVOO.

IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOO and 0.35% for FLQS.

IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOO and FLQS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer