IVOL vs. KEMQ
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. IVOL is actively managed, while KEMQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOL returned -5.77%/yr vs -2.87%/yr for KEMQ. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.
Performance
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than KEMQ's 6.99% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- -5.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMQ
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.33% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 14.56% | 3.23% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 6.99% | 56.28% | 13.81% | 0.77% | -38.09% | -27.31% | 39.26% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and KEMQ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019 | 0.01 |
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOL
KEMQ
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IVOL
KEMQ
-
Basic Materials
IVOL
-
KEMQ
-
Communication Services
IVOL
-
KEMQ
Consumer Cyclical
IVOL
-
KEMQ
Consumer Defensive
IVOL
-
KEMQ
Energy
IVOL
-
KEMQ
-
Healthcare
IVOL
-
KEMQ
Industrials
IVOL
-
KEMQ
-
Real Estate
IVOL
-
KEMQ
-
Technology
IVOL
-
KEMQ
Utilities
IVOL
-
KEMQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
KEMQ
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOL | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.25 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.69 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 4.52 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOL | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 1.42 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | -0.09 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.06 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and KEMQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -70.72% | +39.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -21.94% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | -21.94% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -66.02% | +35.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -28.14% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -35.69% | +22.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 8.20% | -3.82% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 10.09% | -9.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 20.87% | -16.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 26.14% | -19.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 31.88% | -19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 29.58% | -17.59% |
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than KEMQ's 4.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 4.92% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and KEMQ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMQ has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.
On 5-year performance, KEMQ leads with -2.87% vs -5.77% for IVOL. On fees, KEMQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMQ has performed better with a -2.87% return vs -5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 3.89% for IVOL.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KEMQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.60% for KEMQ.
KEMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and KEMQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer