IVOL vs. KBA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. IVOL is actively managed, while KBA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOL returned -5.77%/yr vs 6.46%/yr for KBA. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.

Performance

IVOL vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 12.62% return.

IVOL

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -3.62%
• YTD: -6.33%
• 6M: -7.21%
• 1Y: -5.59%
• 3Y*: -3.54%
• 5Y*: -5.77%
• 10Y*: —

KBA

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 16.80%
• 1Y: 49.12%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 10.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOL vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	-6.33%	11.97%	-11.07%	-5.18%	-12.69%	-0.31%	14.56%	3.23%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	12.62%	33.88%	15.73%	-16.77%	-3.49%	3.17%	41.62%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOL and KBA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019	0.04

IVOL vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVOL	KBA
Financial Services	77.1%	18.5%
Basic Materials	-	10.9%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.8%
Energy	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	4.1%
Industrials	-	15.8%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Technology	-	29.8%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

IVOL vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOL

IVOL Risk / Return Rank: 3
IVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
IVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

KBA

KBA Risk / Return Rank: 85
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOL vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVOL	KBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	2.80	-3.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	3.80	-4.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.50	-0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	6.45	-7.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	17.29	-18.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVOL vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOL Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOL and KBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVOL	KBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	2.80	-3.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	0.24	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.35	-0.47

Drawdowns

IVOL vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and KBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVOL	KBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.16%	-53.24%	+22.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.81%	-7.65%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.63%	-31.23%	+14.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.62%	-39.95%	+9.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.33%	-1.25%	-25.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.30%	-25.81%	+12.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	2.85%	+1.53%

Volatility

IVOL vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVOL	KBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	7.29%	-6.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	12.44%	-8.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.89%	17.65%	-10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.84%	27.20%	-14.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.99%	25.32%	-13.33%

IVOL vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVOL vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than KBA's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	3.89%	3.61%	3.83%	3.73%	3.92%	3.93%	3.44%	2.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	1.39%	1.56%	2.18%	2.34%	49.05%	9.07%	0.65%	1.53%	3.77%	1.46%	6.62%	29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVOL and KBA in my portfolio?

IVOL and KBA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVOL or KBA?

KBA has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs KBA's -53.24%.

Which ETF is better, IVOL or KBA?

On 5-year performance, KBA leads with 6.46% vs -5.77% for IVOL. On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVOL or KBA?

Over the 5-year period, KBA has performed better with a 6.46% return vs -5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVOL or KBA?

KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVOL or KBA?

IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.39% for KBA.

What is the main difference between IVOL and KBA?

IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KBA is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.60% for KBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.