PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOG has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.61%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


IVOG

1D
0.27%
1M
5.95%
YTD
19.25%
6M
19.31%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.61%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
19.25%7.34%15.62%17.36%-19.08%18.85%22.60%26.13%-10.58%19.90%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOG and VGT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.77

The correlation between IVOG and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOG
VGT

Industrials

30.9%
0.4%

Technology

21.9%
98.5%

Healthcare

13.5%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

7.3%
0.5%

Real Estate

5.5%

-

Energy

3.7%
0.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Utilities

2.0%

-

Communication Services

1.5%
0.5%

Industrials

IVOG
30.9%
VGT
0.4%

Technology

IVOG
21.9%
VGT
98.5%

Healthcare

IVOG
13.5%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOG
8.0%
VGT
0.1%

Financial Services

IVOG
7.3%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

IVOG
5.5%
VGT

-

Energy

IVOG
3.7%
VGT
0.3%

Basic Materials

IVOG
3.6%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

IVOG
2.1%
VGT

-

Utilities

IVOG
2.0%
VGT

-

Communication Services

IVOG
1.5%
VGT
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOG
IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOGVGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

2.95

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

3.63

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.69

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

11.77

+0.56

IVOG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOGVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.95

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.89

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.05

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.68

-0.04

Drawdowns

IVOG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-54.63%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-16.40%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.61%

-27.23%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-35.07%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

-35.07%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.48%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-7.95%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

5.13%

-2.67%

Volatility

IVOG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) is 5.18%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that IVOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

6.39%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

16.07%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

20.57%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

25.18%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

24.60%

-4.01%

IVOG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.64%0.79%1.15%1.05%0.47%0.74%1.17%1.01%0.93%1.11%1.04%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOG and VGT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to IVOG (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 11.61% for IVOG. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IVOG.

IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

IVOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IVOG and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer