IVOG vs. IVOO
IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) and IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from Vanguard - IVOG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index while IVOO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOG returned 11.58%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for IVOO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IVOG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOO.
Performance
IVOG vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's 14.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOG having a 11.58% annualized return and IVOO not far behind at 11.22%.
IVOG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
IVOO
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
IVOG vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 18.93% | 7.34% | 15.62% | 17.36% | -19.08% | 18.85% | 22.60% | 26.13% | -10.58% | 19.90% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.15% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOG and IVOO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IVOG and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOG vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOG
IVOO
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IVOG
IVOO
Technology
IVOG
IVOO
Healthcare
IVOG
IVOO
Consumer Cyclical
IVOG
IVOO
Financial Services
IVOG
IVOO
Real Estate
IVOG
IVOO
Energy
IVOG
IVOO
Basic Materials
IVOG
IVOO
Consumer Defensive
IVOG
IVOO
Utilities
IVOG
IVOO
Communication Services
IVOG
IVOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOG vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank
IVOG
IVOO
IVOG vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.75 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 2.54 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.06 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 11.19 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.75 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IVOG vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and IVOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -42.33% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -8.81% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.61% | -24.22% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.31% | -24.22% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | -42.33% | +3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -5.27% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.41% | +0.05% |
Volatility
IVOG vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 4.46%. This indicates that IVOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.46% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.21% | 11.38% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 15.56% | +1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 19.73% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 21.20% | -0.61% |
IVOG vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOG vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison
IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.79% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 1.04% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IVOG and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVOG has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to IVOO (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs IVOO's -42.33%.
On 10-year performance, IVOG leads with 11.58% vs 11.22% for IVOO. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IVOG.
IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.54% for IVOG.
IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IVOG and 0.10% for IVOO.
IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOG and IVOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer