IVNQX vs. MLPAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVNQX (Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund) and MLPAX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - IVNQX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Invesco, while MLPAX is a MLPs fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, IVNQX returned 18.49%/yr vs 21.52%/yr for MLPAX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVNQX charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for MLPAX.

Performance

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVNQX achieves a 21.57% return, which is significantly higher than MLPAX's 17.69% return.

IVNQX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 19.92%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: 28.80%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

MLPAX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 6M: 17.41%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: 25.81%
• 5Y*: 21.52%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	21.57%	20.77%	25.43%	54.62%	-32.05%	26.75%	8.46%
MLPAX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A	17.69%	4.31%	40.77%	20.43%	29.07%	39.45%	15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IVNQX and MLPAX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020	0.28

The correlation between IVNQX and MLPAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IVNQX vs. MLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVNQX

IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 76
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MLPAX

MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVNQX	MLPAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	1.78	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.45	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.30	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	3.28	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.01	9.15	+4.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the MLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVNQX and MLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVNQX	MLPAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	1.78	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	1.11	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.30	+0.55

Drawdowns

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVNQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, smaller than the maximum MLPAX drawdown of -77.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVNQX and MLPAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVNQX	MLPAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.83%	-77.51%	+42.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-6.17%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-15.29%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.83%	-21.04%	-13.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.07%	+4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-17.05%	+8.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.20%	+0.90%

Volatility

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) is 4.48%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that IVNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVNQX	MLPAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	4.84%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.17%	8.67%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	11.44%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.50%	19.46%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.41%	25.98%	-3.57%

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVNQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPAX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVNQX vs. MLPAX - Dividend Comparison

IVNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than MLPAX's 5.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	1.08%	1.31%	0.72%	0.54%	0.73%	0.84%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPAX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A	5.18%	5.72%	5.00%	5.91%	6.56%	7.91%	14.02%	9.91%	10.40%	8.21%	7.34%	7.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVNQX and MLPAX in my portfolio?

IVNQX and MLPAX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVNQX or MLPAX?

MLPAX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to IVNQX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVNQX dropped -34.83% vs MLPAX's -77.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.